Longsword VS Katana – Who Will Win?

The most popular, iconic, and recognizable weapons in history have always been the European longsword and the Japanese katana – both having great designs that have evolved and developed to efficiently face the numerous challenges that were present in the battlefield. Each of the weapons have been improved and tested throughout time under the unforgivingly strenuous and devastating trials of war and battles, adapting to the circumstances to provide warriors with extremely durable, efficient, and powerful tools that were utilized on the battlefield.

The Katana and the Longsword

The idea of evaluating the katana vs longsword can be truly intriguing, yet attempting to do so can be quite interesting, as well as challenging; it is actually more complicated than simply throwing out the question, “The katana VS longsword, which one is better?”. Both of the swords feature unique and interesting characteristics that categorize the blades as part of historical weapons, and some of these attributes include their specific weight, length, shape, as well as their blade geometry, point, edge, and hilt configuration. Additionally, when these weapons are wielded correctly, both swords possess a specific core of gravity as well as inherent balance.

The Katana

The katana is known to be one of the traditionally made blades that were greatly utilized by the samurai warriors of the ancient and the feudal period of Japan The katana can be described by its distinctly unique appearance that features a single-edged and curved blade with either a squared or circular guard; additionally, it also features a long grip to accommodate both of the wielder’s hands. The katana has grown popular due to its cutting power and effectiveness, plus its single, wedge-like, and hardened edge has been claimed to exhibit excellent sharpness.


A longsword is a specific type of European weapon that is depicted by having a cruciform hilt and a double handed grip that measures around six to eleven inches; it also features a straight, double-edged blade that approximately measures around thirty-three to forty-three inches. The design of the longsword, specifically its hilt arrangement and center of gravity, allows the wielder to take full advantage of the weapon’s blade, allowing them to stab or thrust further compared to when they utilize a short sword; additionally, having a blade with a narrower point allows the user to thrust faster with excellent penetration compared to wider blades that are developed specifically for cutting.  The longsword has been utilized since the ancient times where fencers during the mid-sixteenth century displayed that straight weapons were able to execute quicker thrusts in a more deceptive manner compared to semi-curved or curved blades.

Katana VS Longsword

When it comes to the katana vs longsword, both were considered as established thrust and cut weapons and are both efficient for slicing, slashing, as well as stabbing moves; also, these weapons make use of defensive and counter-striking displacements and each of the swords made use of a specific style of swordsmanship that was exhibited through proper control of timing and distance. Since the relative weight of the katana and longsword were almost equal, the differences all go down to both swords’ geometry of how each of these can be utilized and moved: curved blades that are shorter can quickly slash a target whereas a longer, straighter, and narrow blade can instead, thrust faster.  This only means that one specifically emphasized swift and quick slicing moves that are considered decisive single strikes, while the other emphasized quick, long-reaching stabs in combination attacks.

Moreover, there were also evidences that show both swords created in different versions that were specifically for armored battle, while other versions were intended for unarmored battle. Because of this, it only further complicates all efforts to ascertain the design’s sturdiness and durability.

Katana VS Rapier – Who Will Win?

There are numerous claims and beliefs that the rapier vs katana represent the most ideal cutting and thrusting blades – generally the highest evolution of weapons from the East and West. Because of this, there are usually various speculations among individuals who speculate on what the outcome may be in a battle between the katana and the rapier. Below are some of the differences between the Rapier VS Katana.


Comparing the rapier vs katana, the katana has a couple of measurements and characteristics that separate it from other samurai blades. Usually, Katana sword would have a total length of about three to four feet where its tsuka takes up about one-fourth of its measurements. Additionally, the katana also features a unique arch of about an inch yet this can vary depending on the swordsmith creating the weapon.

Compared to the double-edged arming swords of the Europeans, the katana usually exhibited its point of balance right at the blade, focusing more on slashing attacks than thrusting. Depending on the geometry of its blade, the katana can be designed and created to have its tip deliver deadly slashes, or it could also be fashioned featuring a triangular and chisel-like tip to execute stronger thrusts. Additionally, the arch of the katana blade allowed its wielder to perform precise cutting attacks from the draw; it was a highly advantageous feature on a fight since executed cuts after drawing the katana could seriously injure the enemy’s unprotected body parts before he had time to react.


When the rapier vs katana is observed, the rapier is known as a narrow, rigid, single-handed thrusting weapon that features a thick tapered cross-section together with a sharp and extremely narrow point. It is a generally thin and lightweight weapon that is also well-balanced, making these swords specifically for thrusting and intended for single, unarmored combat. The rapier also featured a unique aspect that allowed the user to execute agile and extremely deceptive attacks, as well as continuous deadly thrusts that were carried out at unpredictable angles. The rapier also allowed the user to accurately stab right at an enemy’s throat, face, eyes, and even the hands, sending out light rapid attacks that would distract and provoke an opponent.

Rapier VS Katana

If both swords were correlated with each other, the rapier vs katana would definitely have their own advantages in battle: in a duel, the rapier would most likely win due to it being a nimble and quick weapon that offered excellent reach despite being a single-handed weapon. Yet during fights on the battlefield, the rapier would lack advantage compared to the single-hit of the katana which is why the rapier was never utilized on the battlefields.

When it comes to both weapons, the most vital aspect would be the quality of the blades: an excellent razor-sharp katana could easily execute slicing and slashing attacks whereas a finely made rapier that was solid enough to cut could also defeat a katana. In another situation, when both the rapiers were left undrawn, the katana would have greater advantage when drawing since its arched blade allowed quicker and more fluid movements, giving the wielder the chance to execute instant slashing attacks unlike with the rapier that featured a straighter and longer blade. A possible outcome of a duel between the rapier VS katana would be the rapier wielder executing simultaneous thrusting attacks, taking advantage of the weapon’s superior reach; however, this would do little to prevent the katana wielder’s momentum from executing a fatal chop.

Additionally, there are some who claim that if both wielders with equal skill were only armed with their respective weapons which were sheathed, the katana would have 98% chances of winning since Iaijutsu would inflict attacks on the rapier wielder even before he or she has drawn the weapon.